• About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Submit Your Success Story
  • Hindi Version
Monday, December 15, 2025
Indian Cooperative
IFFCO Banner
  • Home
  • Cooperative Federations
    • NCUI
    • NAFED
    • NCCF
    • NAFCUB
    • SUGAR COOP
    • HOUSING COOP
    • NCDC
    • NFCL
    • IFFCO
    • KRIBHCO
    • Fishcofed
  • Banks
  • Dairy
  • Fertilizer
    • IFFCO
    • KRIBHCO
  • Cooperator
    • Cooperative Recruitment
    • Cooperative Success Stories
    • Co-op News Snippets
    • Cooperative Coffee Shop
    • Cooperative Complaint Board
  • ICA
  • Laws/Legislations
  • States
  • Video
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Cooperative Federations
    • NCUI
    • NAFED
    • NCCF
    • NAFCUB
    • SUGAR COOP
    • HOUSING COOP
    • NCDC
    • NFCL
    • IFFCO
    • KRIBHCO
    • Fishcofed
  • Banks
  • Dairy
  • Fertilizer
    • IFFCO
    • KRIBHCO
  • Cooperator
    • Cooperative Recruitment
    • Cooperative Success Stories
    • Co-op News Snippets
    • Cooperative Coffee Shop
    • Cooperative Complaint Board
  • ICA
  • Laws/Legislations
  • States
  • Video
No Result
View All Result
Indian Cooperative
No Result
View All Result
IFFCO Banner
NCDC Banner
NCDC Banner
Home Cooperative Queries

Query of G Menon

Mr. I C Naik by Mr. I C Naik
August 9, 2016
in Cooperative Queries
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

May I request your sparing some time to go through this message at your convenience and guide me suitably in the matter.

I am based in Ahmedabad, Gujarat.

I am an owner and occupant of a house in KAMALNAYAN BUNGLOWS at Ahmedabad.

As per the sale deed and other documents, the bunglows are treated and considered as individually owned houses and the common facilities such as garden, club house etc are also owned jointly by all members and NOT by the society.

To provide services such as – water supply, maintenance of common garden

inside road, security etc the owners of Kamalnayan bunglows had formed a society called KAMALNAYANCO OP HOUSING SERVICE SOCIETY LIMITED and got it registered with the District Registrar (Rural) Ahmedabad in the year 2008 and obtained the certificate of registration. The bye-laws of the society was also approved by the District Registrar,

As per the bye-laws each member who owns a house in KAMALNAYAN BUNGLOWS can hold 5 shares of Rs 50 each.

As per the approved bye laws, this service society is not allowed to generate funds by way of overcharging share transfer fee or development fund.

However, during the last financial year they had charged one member who had bought a house in the society under resale Rs 3,00,000/- towards share transfer fee and development fund.

During the current year they had collected from two new members Rs. 3,00,000 each (totaling Rs 6,00,000).

On the basis of the clarification sought by me, the District Registrar of Co Op Societies Ahmedabad had given written instructions to this society NOT to accept any amount other than what is approved in the bye-laws.  As per bye laws, the share transfer fee payable is only Rs. 500 and the entrance fee is Rs. 5, totaling Rs. 505/-.

However, the society is not willing to follow the approved bye laws and the written instructions from the Registrar.

The Auditor of the society is approving the society accounts and issuing his report without considering the bye laws or the instructions from the Registrar.

Under these circumstances, I seek your valuable guidance as to what action I can take against the society and the auditor in particular for the negligence and cheating the newly joined members.

Your valuable guidance will help me to proceed further in the matter.

I C Naik

“However, during the last financial year they had charged one member who had bought a house in the society under resale Rs 3,00,000/- towards share transfer fee and development fund. During the current year they had collected from two new members Rs. 3,00,000 each (totaling Rs 6,00,000).”

In above statement THEY means who? This is a grievance against this “THEY” were they authorized in law to get this 3 lacs? If not invoke penal provisions provided under that law.

This is a grievance of a member concerned. Were you asked to shell out Rs 300,000/- If you can prove it, and also disprove that it was a voluntary donation it is a fit case for raising a dispute before Consumer Court, as it is a deficient service by the unregistered association of bungalow owners.

Tags: AhmedabadcooperativedistrictRegistrar
Share284Tweet177SendShare71
Previous Post

Query of Arvind Naik

Next Post

Arecanut co-ops demand ban on import

Next Post
Arecanut co-ops demand ban on import

Arecanut co-ops demand ban on import

saraswatbank
nafed-india
PIMPRI
Image Slideshow
Repco Bank
Kerala Bank Advertisement
Sharad Bank
Prime Bank Advertisement
Deogiri Bank
Tirupati Urban Cooperative Bank
Blinking Ads with 4-Second Interval
WBSCB Ad 1 WBSCB Ad 2 Tripura StCB Ad RNSB Ad Citizen Coop Society Ad
Ad Banner
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Submit Your Success Story
  • Hindi Version

© 2020 IndianCooperative.com.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Cooperative Federations
    • NCUI
    • NAFED
    • NCCF
    • NAFCUB
    • SUGAR COOP
    • Housing
    • NCDC
    • NFCL
    • IFFCO
    • KRIBHCO
    • Fishcofed
  • Banks
  • Dairy
  • Fertilizer
    • IFFCO
    • KRIBHCO
  • NCUI
  • Cooperator
  • ICA
  • Laws/Legislations
  • States
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Your Success Story
  • Video

© 2020 IndianCooperative.com.