• About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Submit Your Success Story
  • Hindi Version
Monday, December 15, 2025
Indian Cooperative
IFFCO Banner
  • Home
  • Cooperative Federations
    • NCUI
    • NAFED
    • NCCF
    • NAFCUB
    • SUGAR COOP
    • HOUSING COOP
    • NCDC
    • NFCL
    • IFFCO
    • KRIBHCO
    • Fishcofed
  • Banks
  • Dairy
  • Fertilizer
    • IFFCO
    • KRIBHCO
  • Cooperator
    • Cooperative Recruitment
    • Cooperative Success Stories
    • Co-op News Snippets
    • Cooperative Coffee Shop
    • Cooperative Complaint Board
  • ICA
  • Laws/Legislations
  • States
  • Video
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Cooperative Federations
    • NCUI
    • NAFED
    • NCCF
    • NAFCUB
    • SUGAR COOP
    • HOUSING COOP
    • NCDC
    • NFCL
    • IFFCO
    • KRIBHCO
    • Fishcofed
  • Banks
  • Dairy
  • Fertilizer
    • IFFCO
    • KRIBHCO
  • Cooperator
    • Cooperative Recruitment
    • Cooperative Success Stories
    • Co-op News Snippets
    • Cooperative Coffee Shop
    • Cooperative Complaint Board
  • ICA
  • Laws/Legislations
  • States
  • Video
No Result
View All Result
Indian Cooperative
No Result
View All Result
IFFCO Banner
NCDC Banner
NCDC Banner
Home Cooperative Queries

Issue of higher maintenance charges

Mr. I C Naik by Mr. I C Naik
May 13, 2015
in Cooperative Queries
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Vikas

We are facing one issue of higher maintenance this year due to resolution passed by MC in a GBM.

Only tenants will be charged differential maintenance amount (to the tune of 20% or less)

In an apartment of 300 flats, 110 are rented out to Tenants. Only 110 families will pay extra maintenac eamount and the rest of the residing owners will enjoy the money paid by tenants.

Could you pls. tell us if this is correct? Secondly, we plan to complain to the Police of the stress, disharmony created by MC. Can we take some legal action against them?

I C Naik

This is a Non Occupancy Charges in the guise of additional maintenance. File a complain to the Dy. Registrar about this. This is in violation to the follwing order made by the Government which has been held by High Court as not illegal.

Government of Maharashtra Co-operation and Textiles Department Govt. Order No.SAGRUYO-1094/15165/ case No. 317/14-C /Mantralaya Extension, Mumbai- 32 dated 1st August 2001.

Relevant Judgment is the Mont Blanc Co-Operative Housing … vs The State Of Maharashtra

(2 March, 2007 [2007 (4) MhLj 595]

Side by side as many as possible but not less than 60 members should requisition a Special General Body meeting of the members to RESOLVE that NOC shall not be charged in excess of the amount worked out as per Circular referred to above and also Resolved that any excess charged by whatever name called to the members who have sublet ther flats be refunded immediately and in future no such excess shall be charged, Since a large number of members are interested the resolution should be passed.

 

Tags: cooperativesDy RegistrarGBMmaharashtraMC
Share284Tweet177SendShare71
Previous Post

Amul: Girl with polka dots has kept pace with time

Next Post

Obnoxious issue of leakage

Next Post

Obnoxious issue of leakage

saraswatbank
nafed-india
PIMPRI
Image Slideshow
Repco Bank
Kerala Bank Advertisement
Sharad Bank
Prime Bank Advertisement
Deogiri Bank
Tirupati Urban Cooperative Bank
Blinking Ads with 4-Second Interval
WBSCB Ad 1 WBSCB Ad 2 Tripura StCB Ad RNSB Ad Citizen Coop Society Ad
Ad Banner
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Submit Your Success Story
  • Hindi Version

© 2020 IndianCooperative.com.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Cooperative Federations
    • NCUI
    • NAFED
    • NCCF
    • NAFCUB
    • SUGAR COOP
    • Housing
    • NCDC
    • NFCL
    • IFFCO
    • KRIBHCO
    • Fishcofed
  • Banks
  • Dairy
  • Fertilizer
    • IFFCO
    • KRIBHCO
  • NCUI
  • Cooperator
  • ICA
  • Laws/Legislations
  • States
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Your Success Story
  • Video

© 2020 IndianCooperative.com.